2-Day Workshop · 26–27 Oct 2026 · Amara Singapore

Investigative Interview& Interrogation

Interview for the Facts. Interrogate for the Confession.

Start with a neutral investigative interview to establish the facts. Move into evidence-led, non-confrontational interrogation only when the investigation warrants it.

Practise professional questioning, contradiction handling, admission-seeking and investigation reporting through realistic cases and role-play.

Serving Singapore’s public sector since 2004

14Ministries
56Statutory Boards
11Other Agencies
1,500+Training Places

Why This Matters

The Wrong Start Can Push The Subject Into Denial.

Good investigations begin with interview, not interrogation. Starting with confrontation can shut down useful information and create a cycle of resistance and repeated denial.

The Interview Was Skipped

Starting with confrontation can shut down useful information too early.

Behaviour Was Misread

Nervousness, silence or emotion can be mistaken for guilt.

The Account Was Shaped

Leading or loaded questions can influence what you hear.

Contradictions Came Too Soon

Evidence introduced too early can reduce the value of the response.

The Subject Entered A Denial Loop

Premature interrogation can produce repeated denial instead of a fuller account.

The Outcome Became Harder To Defend

Poor sequencing can weaken both the questioning and the final finding.

The Capability Gap

Investigative Interviewing Is A Structured Skill, Not A Normal Workplace Interview.

Managers, HR, compliance professionals and investigators may already be experienced interviewers. Investigative interviewing serves a different evidential purpose: obtain an uncontaminated account, identify gaps, test inconsistencies and preserve a defensible record.

General interviewing habits

  • Ask questions to understand or resolve an issue
  • Follow the conversation as it develops
  • Clarify answers as questions arise
  • Rely heavily on experience, instinct or rapport

Investigative interviewing discipline

  • Prepare from evidence and defined information gaps
  • Obtain the full account before narrowing the inquiry
  • Sequence questions without leading or contaminating answers
  • Test contradictions and shift to interrogation only when warranted

General HR or management interviewing techniques are not designed for this evidential task. The structured skills have to be trained and practised.

About This Workshop

Build The Skills To Interview and Interrogate Professionally.

This two-day workshop develops the questioning process in the right order: prepare, interview, clarify, test against evidence, interrogate where warranted and report the outcome clearly.

You learn to obtain the account before challenging it—and avoid moving into interrogation too early.

Work through realistic cases, questioning exercises, behavioural observation, timelines and role-play across public-sector and corporate investigations.

Who Should Attend

For investigations where the account has to stand up to review.

Relevant to public-sector and corporate professionals responsible for fact-finding, investigations, misconduct or disciplinary inquiries.

Misconduct & Disciplinary Matters Fraud & Scams Market Malpractice Compliance & Governance Regulatory & Enforcement Security & Loss Prevention Workplace Safety & Risk Complaints, Witnesses & Suspected Wrongdoers

What You'll Gain

Know When To Interview, and When To Interrogate.

Make better investigative decisions at each stage of the questioning process.

Prepare From The Evidence

Identify gaps and set clear questioning objectives.

Start With The Interview

Obtain a full account before challenge or confrontation.

Observe Without Assuming

Use behaviour to guide inquiry — not to decide guilt.

Test The Account Against Evidence

Probe timelines, inconsistencies and corroborating information.

Know When To Shift

Recognise when the evidence justifies moving into interrogation.

Document The Outcome

Record material information, admissions, findings and follow-up.

Sequence Questions Deliberately

Move from broad accounts to clarification and challenge.

Seek An Admission Professionally

Use evidence and appropriate challenge without improper pressure.

Why This Workshop Is Different

It Teaches The Judgement Between The Questions.

The focus is not simply which question to ask, but what the evidence requires you to do next.

Interview Comes First
Obtain the account before moving into evidence-led interrogation.
Evidence Drives The Shift
Not body language, instinct or premature suspicion.
Questioning Is A Progression
Each question type has a purpose and timing.
Evidence Is Introduced Strategically
Challenge contradictions without losing fairness or control.
Confession-Seeking Without Coercion
Pursue admissions within legal, ethical and organisational boundaries.
From Questioning To Defensible Finding
Connect the questioning outcome to evaluation and reporting.

Programme Outline

From Interview Foundations To Evidence-Led Interrogation.

Day 1 builds the interview foundation. Day 2 develops evidence testing, interrogation and reporting.

Day 1Interview Foundations, Behaviour and Questioning
Module 1

Introduction to Investigative Interviewing

  • Define investigative interviewing and non-confrontational interrogation
  • Distinguish interviewing from confession-seeking
  • Understand why the interview should come first
Module 2

Rights, Roles and Professional Responsibilities

  • Apply interviewer responsibilities and procedural safeguards
  • Explain the interview process clearly and maintain proper records
  • Avoid threats, promises and improper pressure
Module 3

Behavioural Observation and Body Language

  • Observe verbal, vocal and non-verbal behaviour objectively
  • Consider baseline, culture, emotion and health factors
  • Use behaviour to guide clarification—not to infer guilt
Module 4

Communication and Questioning Skills

  • Build rapport and apply active listening
  • Use open, probing, clarifying and challenge questions
  • Sequence questions and manage evasive responses
Day 2Evidence, Credibility, Interrogation and Reporting
Module 5

Planning, Preparation and Interview Stages

  • Review the case, evidence and information gaps
  • Set objectives and plan the questioning sequence
  • Obtain the full account before challenge or closure
Module 6

Clarification, Contradictions and Evidence

  • Obtain a free and uninterrupted account
  • Clarify details and test inconsistencies fairly
  • Present evidence appropriately and confirm key information
Module 7

Emotions, Credibility and Denial

  • Manage distress, anger, silence and other emotional responses
  • Assess credibility through consistency, corroboration and context
  • Recognise how premature interrogation can create denial loops
Module 8

Interrogation and Practical Application

  • Use evidence-led, non-confrontational interrogation where warranted
  • Allow explanations while protecting dignity and procedural fairness
  • Apply the process and convert findings into a structured report

Your Trainer

Over 20 Years in Investigation and Training.

Alan Elangovan
Master Trainer · Author · Curriculum Designer
30+ Years Investigative Expertise 20 Years with ICA 7 Years with SAF 125,000 Professionals Trained

Alan Elangovan’s experience spans investigative techniques, behavioural observation, security questioning, professional interviewing and report writing, with programmes delivered across more than 30 countries.

His career includes 20 years with the Immigration & Checkpoints Authority under Singapore’s Ministry of Home Affairs and seven years with the Singapore Armed Forces.

Alan also developed the proprietary BEHAVE Investigative Framework. Selected components support preparation and evaluation in this workshop without replacing established procedures or professional judgement.

Trainer's Professional Background
Immigration & Checkpoints AuthorityMinistry of Home AffairsSingapore Armed Forces

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. It develops the judgement behind preparation, sequencing, evidence testing and when the questioning objective needs to change.

Interview comes first. It seeks relevant, reliable information from a neutral position. Moving into interrogation too early can create resistance and repeated denial. Interrogation follows only when the evidence materially implicates the subject and an admission or confession becomes an investigative objective.

No. The workshop teaches evidence-led, non-confrontational interrogation without threats, humiliation, improper promises or coercive pressure.

Download the ready-to-edit Justification for Approval Letter. It sets out the course relevance, objectives and organisational benefit so you can adapt it for your supervisor or approving authority. Government billing is available through Vendors@Gov / InvoiceNow.

↓  Download Justification for Approval Letter

Yes. The same evidence-led questioning principles apply to employee misconduct, fraud, scams, market malpractice, compliance, security and other internal investigations—within your organisation’s legal and procedural boundaries.

No. Behaviour may identify something to clarify, but it is not proof of deception.

Investigative Questioning Techniques concentrates on question choice, phrasing, sequence and timing. This workshop covers the wider progression from interview preparation and account-gathering through evidence testing, interrogation and reporting.

Register Now

Investigative Interview & Interrogation

9.00 am–5.00 pm daily | Amara Singapore

Select Run Date
Booking Person
Government agencies only

Invoice Attention To (leave blank if same as booking person)

Participant(s) Attending